Drawing for RAK'D UP

USPTO serial 85057068

RAK'D UP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAK'D UP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Fred W. Hathaway

FRED W. HATHAWAY BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC1737 KING STREETSUITE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, jackets, socks, all for use by sportsmen and hunting enthusiasts; headwear, for use by sportsmen and hunting enthusiastsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 5, 2011CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 4, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 28, 2011EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 22, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2010AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2010AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 14, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance