Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 85057259?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/85057259. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns B.E.A.C.O.N.?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 85057259, the listed owner(s) include: Bland, Kenneth, Bland, Kenneth, McDowell, Darrell, McDowell, Darrell.

What is USPTO serial number 85057259?

Serial number 85057259 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark B.E.A.C.O.N.. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover B.E.A.C.O.N.?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 85057259

B.E.A.C.O.N.

Q: What is the current status of B.E.A.C.O.N.?

B.E.A.C.O.N. (85057259) currently shows USPTO status code 607 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607

Filing date: Jun 8, 2010
Status date: Nov 28, 2012
Registration date: —
Examiner: MADDEN, ANNE
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B.E.A.C.O.N.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Bland, Kenneth
Spokane, WA
Other trademarks owned by Bland, Kenneth
Bland, Kenneth
Spokane, WA
Other trademarks owned by Bland, Kenneth
McDowell, Darrell
Spokane, WA
Other trademarks owned by McDowell, Darrell
McDowell, Darrell
Spokane, WA
Other trademarks owned by McDowell, Darrell

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Schloff

JAY SCHLOFF AIDENBAUM SCHLOFF AND BLOOM PLLC6960 ORCHARD LAKE RD STE 315WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322-4527UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	A communications platform for transmitting data to mobile devices via a cell broadcast service or short message service, namely, computer application software for mobile phones for transmitting data and messages	ACTIVE	Aug 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Nov 28, 2012	MAB7	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT	—
Nov 28, 2012	ABN7	ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT	—
Mar 16, 2012	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Mar 16, 2012	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2012	CNFR	SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 6, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 19, 2012	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2011	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2011	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2011	CNRT	SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 15, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 8, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2011	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2011	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2011	CNRT	SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2011	SUPC	STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Jul 15, 2011	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Jul 12, 2011	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Jul 12, 2011	EISU	TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED	The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 15, 2011	NOAM	NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 18, 2011	NPUB	OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	—
Jan 18, 2011	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2010	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Dec 9, 2010	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Nov 17, 2010	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Oct 18, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 18, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 18, 2010	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2010	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2010	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2010	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2010	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 15, 2010	MPMK	NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED	—
Jun 14, 2010	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Jun 11, 2010	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—