USPTO serial 85057554
A AYDIN JEWELRY INC. DBA OROGIO JEWELERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A AYDIN JEWELRY INC. DBA OROGIO JEWELERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Loraine Kulik, Esq.
LORAINE KULIK, ESQ. THE LAW OFFICE OF LORAINE KULIK, ESQ.28 SUMMIT STENGLEWOOD, NJ 07631-3708UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Beads for use in the manufacture of jewelry; Body jewelry; Bracelets; Bracelets and jewelry featuring electronic chips for attracting energy to the body wherein the electronic chips increase in power in the presence of electromagnetic fields, for the purpose of re-balancing the human energy field; Broaches; Bronze jewelry; Brooches; Charms; Charms for collar jewelry and bracelet; Costume jewelry; Diamond jewelry; Gemstone jewelry; Gold thread jewelry; Identification bracelets; Inexpensive non-jewelry watches; Jewelry; Jewelry and imitation jewelry; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry boxes not of metal; Jewelry boxes of metal; Jewelry boxes of precious metal; Jewelry brooches; Jewelry cases; Jewelry cases not of precious metal; Jewelry cases of precious metal; Jewelry caskets; Jewelry caskets of precious metal; Jewelry chains; Jewelry findings; Jewelry for attachment to clothing; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry in the nature of armbands; Jewelry incorporating a computer storage device containing medical information for medical alert purposes; Jewelry making kits; Jewelry organizers; Jewelry pins for use on hats; Jewelry ring holders; Jewelry that fits over the front teeth; Jewelry that incorporates technology for rebalancing the human energy field; Jewelry to be affixed to bikinis; Jewelry watches; Jewelry, namely, amulets; Jewelry, namely, anklets; Jewelry, namely, arm cuffs; Jewelry, namely, crosses; Jewelry, namely, dog tags for wear by humans for decorative purposes; Jewelry, namely, magnetic necklaces; Jewelry, namely, magnetic pendants; Jewelry, namely, precious metal plated real leaves and flowers; Jewelry, namely, stone pendants; Lapel pins; Leather jewelry and accessory boxes; Metal wire for use in the making of jewelry, namely, jewelry cable; Pet jewelry; Pins being jewelry; Plastic bracelets in the nature of jewelry; Precious and semi-precious | ACTIVE | Jan 6, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |