Drawing for MASTER

USPTO serial 85057611

MASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William A. Johnston

WILLIAM A. JOHNSTON CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP800 SUPERIOR AVE E STE 1400CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2617UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric, electronic and electro-mechanical security devices for doors, namely, door openers, door closers, door locks, fire alarm controls, intelligent access controls, locking and unlocking controls; solenoid locks; audible signal sensing door locks; audible signal generation keys and key parts; electric door openers and door closers and replacement and component parts therefor; mechanically activated or electronically controlled emergency door locks, namely, panic/anti-panic door locks and emergency exit locks; emergency door and exit installations, namely, electric, electromotive or motorized bolts, electronic switches and control cabinets for regulating electric, electromotive or motorized bolts and electronic switches; electronic glass break sensors, electronic vibration sensors, electronic motion sensitive switches; access control and alarm monitoring systems; electrically operated audio and visual personal security alarms; safety equipment, namely, smoke switches for fire doors; electronic and electric code locks, namely, code locks with keypads, electric code locks with magnetic entry cards or key rings, electronic code lock with contact free readers, encoded electronic chip and magnetic identity cards; electric locks actuated by a timer or web-based access control devices; push button electronic coded switches; access control and person identification installations, namely, bar code scanners, security card readers and biometric readers and computer hardware associated therewith, access key pads and computer hardware associated therewith and intercommunications systems, comprised of intercoms; time-recording apparatus, instruments and installations for staff time-recording, performance recording, project planning, capacity planning, project control, personnel planning, service and shift planning, namely, computers, event recorders, time clocks; computer software for facility access control, video imaging used in security control and security alarm monitoring and computer hardware associated therewith; electronic keys, card readers and reader modules, card printers and remote controls associated therewith; all of the above excluding garage door openers, commercial door operators for overhead rolling doors or gate operatorsACTIVE—
042On-line inter-active security system management services that allow users to remotely view, monitor, program, operate and control large and small appliances, electrical systems and security systems in homes, offices and vehicles via a mobile device or PDA and the InternetACTIVE—
045Central station electric protection service, namely, fire alarm monitoring service, night watchmen's supervisory service, intruder and burglar alarm monitoring serviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 7, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 24, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 16, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance