Drawing for OVERDOSE

USPTO serial 85058075

OVERDOSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OVERDOSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Day

Christopher J. Day Law Office of Christopher Day9977 North 90th Street, Suite 155Scottsdale, AZ 85258UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—
032Energy drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 31, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 14, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance