USPTO serial 85058438
OTIGEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OTIGEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Mandel
LAWRENCE D. MANDEL GERTNER MANDEL & PESLAK, LLCPO Box 499Lakewood, NJ 08701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PHONE CASES, PHONE SLEEVES, BAGS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR CARRYING HANDHELD COMPUTER GAME UNITS, CAMERA CASES, CAMCORDER CASES, CAMERA POUCHES, CAMERA BAGS, CAMERA SLEEVES; CARRYING BAGS FOR MP3 PLAYERS, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, GLOBAL POSITIONING APPARATUS AND DVD PLAYERS; COMPUTER CARRYING CASES, BACKPACKS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HOLDING NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SLEEVES, ELECTRONIC AGENDAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LUGGAGE, SUITCASES, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, DUFFLE BAGS, SUIT BAGS, TOTE BAGS, SHOE BAGS FOR TRAVEL, LUGGAGE INSERTS, NAMELY, PACKING CUBES, BACKPACKS, MESSENGER BAGS, COURIER BAGS, CATALOG CASES, SLING BAGS; PERSONAL LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, WALLETS, CREDIT CARD HOLDERS, UMBRELLAS, TRUNKS, BRIEFCASE-TYPE PORTFOLIOS, BUSINESS CARD CASES AND CREDIT CARD CASES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | APPAREL, NAMELY, PAJAMAS, SWIMWEAR, UNDER GARMENTS, BELTS, HATS, CAPS, SHOES, SNEAKERS, SOCKS, TIES, SCARVES, GLOVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shor 4 Apparel Enterprises, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Shor 4 Apparel Enterprises, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named OTIGEAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |