USPTO serial 85058852
AUDIT CENTER AC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUDIT CENTER AC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rio de Janeiro - RJ, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Roppel
ANDREW ROPPEL HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for audit and security services for electronic collaboration in computer networks, namely, local area networks, wide area networks, and the Internet; computer software for auditing e-mails, schedules, collaborative portals and collaborative applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer auditing and security services for electronic collaboration over local area networks, wide area networks, and the Internet, and for auditing e-mails, schedules, collaborative portals and collaborative applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |