Drawing for WEBSTER BANK. EXPECT BETTER BANKING

USPTO serial 85059117

WEBSTER BANK. EXPECT BETTER BANKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBSTER BANK. EXPECT BETTER BANKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane Duhaime

DIANE DUHAIME JORDEN BURT LLP175 POWDER FOREST DR STE 301WEATOGUE, CT 06089-7902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Tax planning, reporting and consultation services; trust, estate and investment custody, administration, record keeping and reporting services, namely, preparing tax letters, statements, summaries and reports, and shareholder record keeping services; providing information in the field of taxes via the internet, global networks, telephone, facsimile or other meansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 17, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 16, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 25, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 25, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 22, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance