USPTO serial 85059301
MAIBERRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAIBERRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Boulder, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne M. Hanson
LYNNE M. HANSON BALLARD SPAHR LLP1225 17TH ST STE 2300DENVER, CO 80202-5535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy-based beverages; fruit-based beverages; and yogurt-based beverages | ACTIVE | Apr 9, 2009 |
| 030 | Frozen yogurt; frozen yogurt-based desserts combined with fruit, nuts, cereal and shaved ice; frozen dairy desserts; frozen confectionery; frozen dairy desserts combined with fruit, nuts, cereal and shaved ice; shaved ice confections; shaved ice-based desserts combined with fruit, nuts and cereal; coffee and coffee-based beverages; tea and tea-based beverages and crepes | ACTIVE | Apr 9, 2009 |
| 032 | Smoothies; fresh fruit and fresh vegetable juices | ACTIVE | Apr 9, 2009 |
| 043 | Restaurant and cafe services; carry-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | Apr 9, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |