Drawing for BRITTON

USPTO serial 85059516

BRITTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRITTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Michael Anderson

D. MICHAEL ANDERSON BARNES & THORNBURG LLP1ST SOURCE BANK CTR STE 600100 N MICHIGAN STSOUTH BEND, IN 46601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Marching and concert band musical instruments and musical instrument accessories, namely, reeds for use in woodwind mouthpieces, mouthpieces for musical instruments, instrument stands and instrument casesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 18, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance