Drawing for PDI PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS

USPTO serial 85059825

PDI PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PDI PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig W. Weinlein

CRAIG W. WEINLEIN CARRINGTON, COLEMAN, SLOMAN & BLUMENTHAL901 MAIN ST., SUITE 5500DALLAS, TX 75202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Educational publications, namely, texts, manuals, handouts, and workbooks in the fields of petroleum accounting, energy, legal services, paralegal and private investigator training, accounting and financial management, financial planning, and personal developmentABANDONEDSep 12, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 21, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 20, 2011LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Dec 20, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 21, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 5, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance