Drawing for WE PUT A DIVERSE FACE TO TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 85059960

WE PUT A DIVERSE FACE TO TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE PUT A DIVERSE FACE TO TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vanessa A. Ignacio, Esq.

VANESSA A. IGNACIO, ESQ. LOWENSTEIN SANDLER PC65 LIVINGSTON AVE STE 2ROSELAND, NJ 07068-1791UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, repair and maintenance of telecommunications networks, apparatus, and instrumentsACTIVE—
042Consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; Planning and development of electronic communications networks; Technical support of electronic communications networks, namely, monitoring of network systems; Remote computer network technical monitoring and software maintenance services; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Design and development of networks; Design, deployment and management of wireless networks for others; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance