USPTO serial 85060315
REINVENTING GEOSPATIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REINVENTING GEOSPATIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Oliveira
KEVIN OLIVEIRA ODIN FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN PC9302 LEE HWY STE 1100FAIRFAX, VA 22031-1215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technical consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems and components; engineering consulting services; research and testing on machines, apparatus and instruments; materials testing and evaluation; new product research and development for others; design and testing for new product development for others; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; computer consulting services for planning, design, and analysis of information processes, systems, and business reengineering; computer services, namely, computer system design and development; computer hardware and software systems integration; computer programming services; computer software design services; computer analysis; computer systems design services; software development; development of computer hardware and software systems and network management software; database development; analysis and design of computer systems, software and information systems for others; design for others of web sites and software applications therefore on local and internal computer networks and the internet; providing design, development and host services for others' internet web sites and wired and wireless computer networks; information technology consultation services; computer consultation on the computer-related aspects of information technology security and e-commerce; providing information over local and internal computer networks and the internet on the subjects of computer analysis, computer systems design services, and software and software development; integration of computer systems and networks | ACTIVE | Jul 16, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |