USPTO serial 85060413
STAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Oliveira
Kevin Oliveira ODIN FELDMAN PITTLEMAN PC1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400Reston, VA 20190-5159UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | consulting services regarding energy, water, waste conservation and management and plant and facility sustainability, namely, consulting services in the field of engineering, namely, greenhouse gas emissions, management, control and reduction, water conservation, sustainable building, waste diversion and electronics stewardship engineering; consulting services regarding carbon management, calculation of carbon, sequestration of carbon and plant and facility sustainability, namely consulting in the field of engineering to reduce carbon emissions and control carbon emissions; consulting services in the field of energy and water management, namely consulting in the field of electric, natural gas and water use, usage and measurement of use and usage; consulting services regarding Executive Order 13514 requirements, namely for greenhouse gas reduction and water conservation requirements, namely technical consulting in the field of environmental engineering; consulting services regarding plant and facility sustainability and environmental management systems goals, namely consulting in the field of design and development of for energy and water systems and use and comprehensive plans for plants and facilities and energy and water systems and use in plants and facilities; consulting services in the field of regulatory compliance with greenhouse gas emissions, management, control and reduction, water conservation, sustainable building, waste diversion and electronics stewardship engineering; consulting services regarding carbon, chemical and waste conservation and management, namely, consulting in the field of recycling and encapsulation of chemicals and waste and recycling of water; consulting services in the field of regulatory compliance with greenhouse gas emissions, management, control and reduction, water conservation, sustainable building, waste diversion and electronics stewardship requirements in Executive Order 13514; consulting services regarding energy and water usage, plant and facility sustainability and comprehensive master planning for energy and water usage, namely, consulting in the field of construction of sustainable and environmentally-conscious buildings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |