USPTO serial 85061337
PINN CLE STYLE WITH SUBSTANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PINN CLE STYLE WITH SUBSTANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angelo Notaro
ANGELO NOTARO NOTARO MICHALOS & ZACCARIA PC100 DUTCH HILL RDORANGEBURG, NY 10962-2197UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Hot pots and casseroles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |