USPTO serial 85061819
CERVIMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CERVIMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Trieste-Basovitta, IT
Trieste-Basovitta, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Baila H. Celedonia
KIERAN G DOYLE COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CERVICAL CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS FOR MEDICAL USE; MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS; AND KITS COMPRISING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOREGOING | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES FOR DETECTING CANCER | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, RESEARCH AND DESIGN RELATING TO PHARMACEUTICALS; INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PHARMACEUTICALS; MEDICAL LABORATORY SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | MEDICAL SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Adriacell S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Adriacell S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CERVIMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |