Drawing for FIDO BYTES

USPTO serial 85062296

FIDO BYTES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIDO BYTES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah Tellerman Berkowitz, Esq.

DEBORAH TELLERMAN BERKOWITZ, ESQ. Johnson & Martin, P.A.500 W. Cypress Creek Road, Suite 430FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software programs and user documentation supplied therewith developed for use in managing pet boarding and day care services, pet grooming services and pet salons, pet retail boutiques, kennels and overnight pet lodging facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 11, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 29, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 25, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 25, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 8, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance