USPTO serial 85063144
VANCOUVER WHITECAPS FC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VANCOUVER WHITECAPS FC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan Blum
ALAN BLUM, Moses & Singer, LLP405 Lexington AvenueThe Chrysler BuildingNew York, NY 10174-1299Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter namely posters, decals, trading cards, calendars, stickers, bumper stickers, paper flags, paper banners, printed paper signs, printed media guides featuring soccer information, souvenir soccer programs, yearbooks in the field of professional soccer, pamphlets in the field of soccer, magazines featuring soccer and printed event admission tickets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, tops and bottoms, headgear, namely, hats, caps, beanies and visors, footwear, outerwear, namely, jackets scarves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2012 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |