Drawing for EMPOWERING GIS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE, ASSETS, PERMITS, AND LICENSING

USPTO serial 85063750

EMPOWERING GIS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE, ASSETS, PERMITS, AND LICENSING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMPOWERING GIS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE, ASSETS, PERMITS, AND LICENSING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. John Pate

A JOHN PATE PATE BAIRD PLLCPO BOX 520958SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84152-0958UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for management of public works and utilities assetsACTIVEMay 17, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 11, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 26, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 26, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 26, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 5, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 5, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 5, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 5, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 16, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 16, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance