USPTO serial 85064399
DIGITAL EXTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL EXTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal, Québec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, video game engines and tools, 3D animation engines and tools, visual effects engines and tools, visual simulation engines and tools and virtual reality engines and tools, and components for all of the foregoing; Refrigerator magnets | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Video game software engine and tool development services; 3D animation software engine and tool development services; Visual effects computer software engine and tool development services; Visual simulation computer software engine and tool development services; Virtual reality computer software engine and tool development services; application service provider, namely, hosting video game software engines and tools, 3D animation software engines and tools, visual effects software engines and tools, visual simulation software engines and tools and virtual reality software engines and tools, and software components for the foregoing all via the Intenet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |