Drawing for THE UNIVERSAL RECORD DATABASE URDB

USPTO serial 85064431

THE UNIVERSAL RECORD DATABASE URDB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE UNIVERSAL RECORD DATABASE URDB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A.W. Wong

DAVID A.W. WONG BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing educational and entertainment information in the fields of world records, record achievements, record breaking events or occurrences, record breaking attempts and outstanding and unusual achievements, failures or occurrences; entertainment services, namely, providing an interactive computer database of videos and data relating to world records, record achievements, record breaking events or occurrences, record breaking attempts and outstanding and unusual achievements, failures or occurrences; organizing and conducting live events and exhibitions for educational, cultural and entertainment purposes, namely, record breaking and achievement events or occurrences and outstanding and unusual achievements, failures or occurrences; entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and variety shows; publication of books and magazinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 30, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 30, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance