USPTO serial 85064585
CRADLE TO CRADLE PRODUCTS INNOVATION INSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2014
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CRADLE TO CRADLE PRODUCTS INNOVATION INSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CRADLE TO CRADLE PRODUCTS INNOVATION INSTITUTE
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by CRADLE TO CRADLE PRODUCTS INNOVATION INSTITUTE
McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC
Charlottesville, VA
Other trademarks owned by McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC
McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC
Charlottesville, VA
Other trademarks owned by McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC
McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC
Charlottesville, VA
Other trademarks owned by McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Omid A. Mantashi
Omid A. Mantashi Law Offices of Omid Mantashi360 Grand Ave., Ste. 90Oakland, CA 94610United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods of others for the purpose of certification | ACTIVE | Jul 10, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRADLE TO CRADLE PRODUCTS INNOVATION INSTITUTE
- Other trademarks owned by McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CRADLE TO CRADLE PRODUCTS INNOVATION INSTITUTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 25, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 25, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 27, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2013 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |