Drawing for BLUE STATE WINE

USPTO serial 85065620

BLUE STATE WINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUE STATE WINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward A. Pennington

Edward A. Pennington Smith Gambrell & Russell, LLP1055 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST., NW,SUITE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bottle stoppers specially adapted for use with wine bottles; Wine bottle cradles; Wine glasses; Wine openers; Wine pourersACTIVE—
025Golf shirts; Hats; Hooded sweat shirts; Polo shirts; T-shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 15, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 15, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 14, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 4, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance