Drawing for SPRING INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 85065770

SPRING INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPRING INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard S. Stockton

RICHARD S. STOCKTON BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.10 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-7437UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Chafing dishes; electric cookware, namely, chafing dishes and coffee urns; electric cookware in the nature of induction heater stove tops and ranges; induction heaters designed as food warmers; and convertible buffet systems in the nature of induction heaters for use as food warmersACTIVE—
021Bakeware; cookware, namely, fry pans, sauce pans, sauciers, tapered pans for concentrating liquids, saute pans, stock pots, casseroles, pasta cooking pots, grille pans, nonelectric griddle pans, braiser pans, roaster pans, stir fry pans, chefs pans, paella pans, omelette pans, au gratin pans, and lids for all of the above; cookware tools and kitchen ware tools, namely, slotted and solid cooking spoons, ladles, spatulas, gravy, sauce and grease skimmers, turners, serving tongs, forks and spoons; household containers, namely, tool caddies for the above mentioned cookware and kitchen ware tools; chafing dishes; soup tureens; coffee urns; portable beverage dispensers, namely, juice dispensers; wine buckets; bottle stands, namely, wine stands; nonelectric woksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance