Drawing for FAMILY MOBILE

USPTO serial 85065869

FAMILY MOBILE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAMILY MOBILE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scot A. Duvall

SCOT A DUVALL MIDDLETON REUTLINGER2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOWER401 S FOURTH AVENUELOUISVILLE, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio headphones; Batteries; Battery chargers; Clear protective covers specially adapted for personal electronic devices; Wireless cellular phone headsets; Wireless telephones; Wireless telephony apparatusACTIVE—
018Carrying cases; Travel casesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 19, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 19, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 5, 2012GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2012GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
May 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 17, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 17, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 17, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 17, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance