Drawing for 3GTV

USPTO serial 85066113

3GTV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 3GTV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl M. Zielaznicki, Esq.

KARL M. ZIELAZNICKI, ESQ. TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035media buying advice services, namely, advising clients on the purchase of advertising; media planning services, namely, advising clients on the purchase of advertising based upon media and/or market analysis; providing consulting services in the field of facilitating the planning, buying, and selling of mediaACTIVE—
038communications services, namely, transmission and broadcasting of video, images, audio and data via broadband networksACTIVE—
042software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in managing, distributing, monitoring and broadcasting all forms of digital media content for the retail promotional advertising and out-of-home media industries; rental of computer hardware and computer peripherals for use in managing, distributing, monitoring and broadcasting all forms of digital media content for the retail promotional advertising and out-of-home industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 18, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance