Drawing for POOCH GOOGLIES

USPTO serial 85066156

POOCH GOOGLIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POOCH GOOGLIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREA F. SELLERS

ANDREA F SELLERS STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP1201 WALNUT STREETSUITE 2900KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Pet toysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 18, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 18, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 1, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 3, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 11, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 11, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 11, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 11, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance