USPTO serial 85066823
INTERCEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERCEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Pérez Guerrero
ARTURO PÉREZ GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PÉREZ GUERREROP.O. BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Asbestos mortar; sand other than sand for casting; sandstone pipes; construction sandstone; construction mortar; argentiferous sand; clay, namely, slabs of clay; brick clay; bitumen; bituminous construction materials, namely, sand; lime, namely, hydrated lime for building purposes, non-agricultural lime for use in construction; sidewalk construction materials, namely, cement mixes; sidewalk construction coating and lining materials, namely, sealer coatings sold as an integral component of non-metal tiles, natural stone, and molded resins for construction purposes; cement mortar slates; cement posts; fireproof cement stucco tiles; cement, namely, cement aggregates, filling cement; asbestos cement, namely, fibrous cement; concrete; concrete construction parts, namely, concrete bollards, concrete walls; non-metallic construction materials, namely, non-metal exterior panels, construction timber; non-metallic construction materials, namely, windows, doors; non-metal stairs; non-metal railroad ties, namely, non-metal railroad sleepers; non-metallic peg-boards; stone, concrete or marble statues; stone, concrete or marble statuettes; non-metal road safety barriers; non-metal frames, namely, non-metal window frames, non-metal door frames; furnace cement; plaster, namely, gypsum; non-metallic slabs, namely, concrete building materials in the nature of slabs, natural stone slabs; non-metal construction panels, namely, concrete panels, fiberglass panels; wall linings not of metal for building; wall and fence linings not of metal for building; non-metallic pavements, namely, concrete road pavement boards, pavement tiles; stone for building and construction; ground granulated slag stone; non-metal floors, non-metal tiles, and non-metal floor tiles; non metallic poles, namely, non-metal utility poles, wood poles; quartz; sidewalk coating, namely, cement mixes, sealer coatings sold as an integral component of non-metal tiles, natural stone, and molded resins for construction purposes; coatings and linings for construction materials, namely, sealer coatings sold as an integral component of non-metal tiles, natural stone, and molded resins for construction purposes; non-metallic linings and coatings for construction materials, namely, sealer coatings sold as an integral component of non-metal tiles, natural stone, and molded resins for construction purposes; silica stone, namely, quartz; non-metal tiles; bricks; binders for brick manufacturing, namely, hydraulic binders, namely, hydraulic cements; non-metallic construction frames, namely, non-metal window and door frames; non-metallic linings and coatings for construction materials, namely, sealer coatings sold as an integral component of non-metal tiles, natural stone, and molded resins for construction purposes; non-metal casting forms for concrete; concrete construction parts, namely, pre-cast concrete wall forms; non-metallic partitions, namely, non-metal toilet partitions; refractory materials, namely, refractory blocks and bricks, not of metal, refractory construction materials, not of metal; white cement; general construction and pavement materials, not made of metal, namely, shores, supports, fiberglass board; construction, structures and prefabricated or precast modules, namely, pre-fabricated homes; pre-fabricated non-metal stables; building materials, namely, pre-cast concrete wall forms; Silver sand; Sand, except foundry sand; Mortar; Mortar for building; Non-metal building materials, namely, wood, concrete, and stone balustrading; Paving blocks, not of metal; Cement slabs; Posts, not of metal, for electric power lines; Cement; Asbestos cement; Surfacings, not of metal, for buildings, namely, ceramic cladding, non-metal modular floors; Concrete; Concrete for shuttering, not of metal; Concrete building elements, namely, tiles, panels, sheets; Construction materials, not of metal, namely, shores, supports, braces; Linings, not of metal, for building; Portable non-metal buildings; Refractory construction materials, not of metal; Reinforcing materials, not of metal, for building; Building panels, not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERCEMENT BRASIL S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CAMARGO CORRÊA CIMENTOS S/A
- Other trademarks owned by CAMARGO CORRÊA CIMENTOS S/A
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named INTERCEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |