Drawing for REAL BRANDS FOR REAL FANS

USPTO serial 85067676

REAL BRANDS FOR REAL FANS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REAL BRANDS FOR REAL FANS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie C. VanDerZanden

JULIE C. VANDERZANDEN Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc.4201 6TH AVE SJarden Seattle Legal Dept.SEATTLE, WA 98108-1702

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Hard sided portable beverage coolers; soft sided portable beverage coolers; portable coolers, namely, hard sided portable ice coolers and soft sided portable ice coolers; portable coolers, namely, portable beverage or ice coolers mounted on wheeled caddies; plastic water bottles sold empty; camping grills; grill accessories, namely, grill coversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 14, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 16, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 16, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 9, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 30, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 30, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance