USPTO serial 85068068
BETTER THAN COD LIVER OIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BETTER THAN COD LIVER OIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | (Based on Intent to Use) Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary food supplements(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary food supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |