Drawing for THE LEADER IN CAMERA-TO-CLOUD SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 85068089

THE LEADER IN CAMERA-TO-CLOUD SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE LEADER IN CAMERA-TO-CLOUD SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mathew J. Temmerman

MATHEW J. TEMMERMAN TEMMERMAN LAW OFFICE423 E STDAVIS, CA 95616-4132UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Security systems comprising software and hardware for providing picture, video, and alerts to a remote location over the Internet; Software for providing access, remote observation and automated and manual control of a security system and its data over the InternetACTIVE—
042Design and development of residential and commercial security systems incorporating alarms, alerts, observation, automated monitoring, asset tracking; Computer services, namely, providing a web-based system featuring on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to access, observe, and control a local or remote security system and its data; Design and development of residential and commercial security systems incorporating alarms, alerts, observation, automated monitoring, asset tracking; Computer services, namely, providing a web-based system featuring on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to access, observe, and control a local or remote security system and its dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 25, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance