USPTO serial 85068168
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
COTATI, CA
COTATI, CA
Morgan Hill, CA
Morgan Hill, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Air pumps of two-wheeled motor vehicles or bicycles; Bicycle brakes; Bicycle chains; Bicycle frames; Bicycle frames and bicycle handlebar grips; Bicycle gears; Bicycle grip tape; Bicycle handlebar grips; Bicycle parts, namely, brake shoes; Bicycle parts, namely, change-speed gears; Bicycle parts, namely, disk wheels; Bicycle parts, namely, drive chains; Bicycle parts, namely, forks; Bicycle parts, namely, front fork joints; Bicycle parts, namely, gear wheels; Bicycle parts, namely, handle bar ends; Bicycle parts, namely, handle bar stems; Bicycle parts, namely, sprockets; Bicycle parts, namely, tubes and connectors for bicycle frames; Bicycle parts, namely, brakes; Bicycle pedals; Bicycle pumps; Bicycle racks for vehicles; Bicycle saddles; Bicycle seat posts; Bicycle water bottle cages; Bicycle wheels; Bicycle wheels, rims and structural parts therefor; Bicycles; Components for bicycles, namely, headsets which provide a rotatable interface between the bicycle fork and the bicycle frame; Delivery bicycles; Frames for bicycles; Front and rear bicycle rack packs; Gear levers for bicycle wheels; Handlebars; Mountain bicycles; Mudguards; Pannier bags for bicycles; Racing bicycles; Racks for vehicles for bicycles; Rims for bicycle wheels; Road racing bicycles; Saddlebags for bicycles; Saddles for bicycles; Spoke clips for bicycle wheels; Spokes for bicycle wheels; Structural parts of bicycles; Suspension systems for bicycles; Tandem bicycles; Tire inflators; Tires; Touring bicycles; Water bottle cages for bicycles; Water bottle holders for bicycles; Wheel hubs; Wheel hubs for bicycles; Wheel rims; Wheels for bicycles, cycles | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 17, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |