USPTO serial 85068390
POWERJET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2014
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with POWERJET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
Jordan A. LaVine Flaster Greenberg P.C.100 Front Street, Suite 100Conshohocken, PA 19428UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical fuel and oil additives used for motors and engines; chemical additives for use in automobiles, trucks and other vehicles; de-icing preparations for use on vehicular glass and locks; chemicals for testing smoke detectors; chemicals for preserving industrial belts; and anti-spatter chemical sprays used for welding | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2012 |
| 002 | Undercoatings for motor vehicles; and paint for use in the repair, maintenance and identification of automobiles and industrial applications; petroleum oils and waxes to protect metal against rust and corrosion for automotive and industrial use | ACTIVE | Sep 13, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRC Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CRC Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CRC Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named POWERJET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 19, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |