USPTO serial 85068647
SLIMKINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SLIMKINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dan Cohn
DAN COHN HUSCH BLACKWELL SANDERS LLP190 CARONDELET PLZ STE 600SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105-3433UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Swimwear and accessories, namely swimsuits, pareos, beach coverups, shorts, shirts, tops, namely blouses, sweaters, shirts, tank tops and halters, jackets and t-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |