Drawing for DNS YOUR WAY

USPTO serial 85068792

DNS YOUR WAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DNS YOUR WAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth D. Suzan

KENNETH D. SUZAN HODGSON RUSS LLP140 PEARL STSTE 100BUFFALO, NY 14202-4040

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Domain name directory servicesACTIVE—
038Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information networkACTIVE—
042Providing online non-downloadable computer software for use in connecting to the Internet for the purpose of providing a wide range of Internet functionality, namely, providing connectivity in the shortest time possible, determining the most direct route of connectivity, routing around inactive machines and routing around inactive linesACTIVE—
045Domain name registry services, namely, coordinating the registration of domain names for identification of users and Internet protocol addresses on the Internet; providing an online computer database in the field of domain names registration information; providing authentication services via online non-downloadable software for establishing and transmitting security credentials for domain name servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 9, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 24, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 9, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 29, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance