Drawing for LAX

USPTO serial 85068869

LAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWER, MARGARET
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maurice U. Cahn

MAURICE U. CAHN CAHN & SAMUELS, LLP1100 17TH ST NW STE 401WASHINGTON, DC 20036-4650UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; Athletic footwear; Athletic shoes; Athletic uniforms; Headbands; Hooded sweat shirts; Shirts; SocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 26, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 16, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 30, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 29, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 25, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance