CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PLANT THE SEED

USPTO serial 85069070

PLANT THE SEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLANT THE SEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William R. Sawyers

William R. Sawyers Del Monte Foods, Inc.One Maritime PlazaSuite 2500San Francisco, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed fruits; Processed vegetablesACTIVE—
044Providing a website featuring information about dietary health, wellness and nutritionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 25, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 2, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 20, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 20, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 25, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 16, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance