USPTO serial 85070253
POLYGLASS DUAL PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLYGLASS DUAL PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen Practus, LLP100 South Bedford Road, Suite 328Mount Kisco, NY 10549United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Gutta-percha; elastic rubber; balata and substitutes, namely, latex for industrial use; objects made of elastic rubber, namely, packing padding of rubber for shipping containers; plates and rods of plastic materials, namely, semi-processed plastic in the form of plates and rods; non-metal flexible tubes, namely, flexible plastic pipes, plastic hoses for use in ventilation; insulating fabrics; sheets and plates used as synthetic waterproofing diaphragm made of polymers, namely, water proofing membranes for foundations of buildings; membranes and waterproof membranes for foundations of buildings; flexible membranes for protection against water and humidity to be used in natural and artificial galleries; plastic materials in sheet and plate form for waterproofing tubs for food and non-food liquids; plastic membranes for waterproofing hydraulic basins; adhesive sealant and caulking compounds; waterproof sealants | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Membranes for use as a floor underlayment; waterproof membrane for use as a floor underlayment; roofing membrane; roofing membrane for above and below grade use; non-metal roofing shingles; roofing underlayments; non-metallic building materials, namely, non-metal decorative moldings and decorative trim for use in building construction; wood paneling; wood flooring, namely, wood flooring boards and parquet wood flooring building stone; natural and artificial stones; bricks; flagstones; tiles, namely, non-metal roofing tiles, pavement tiles; cement, namely, portland cement, cement mixes, slag-lime cement, magnesia cement, non-agricultural lime for use in construction, mortar; cement glue, namely, filling cement; road building materials, namely, concrete, asphalt, concrete road pavement boards, crash bafflers of concrete or plastic for roads, gravel for making road sub surfaces; asphalt; pitch and bitumen; concrete panels, manufactured brick veneer for use on interior and exterior walls, floors and surfaces, patios, poolsides and driveways; compound wood, namely, multilayered wood, glue-laminated wood | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |