USPTO serial 85070683
SENSE ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENSE ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Discs and other media containing software; downloadable software; all to enable the analysis of textual information; software for the disambiguation of textual words contained in the Internet; software for the semantic analysis of textual information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design; recovery of computer data; computer programming; computer system design services; Provision of search engines for the Internet; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; licensing the use of information data bases and software for the disambiguation of textual words contained in the Internet; research and development in the field of languages and semantics; research and development services connected to the disambiguation of textual words contained in the Internet and to the semantic analysis of textual information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |