USPTO serial 85071195
REPUBLIC BY R&R
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REPUBLIC BY R&R?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
ROCK & REPUBLIC ENTERPRISES, INC.
CULVER CITY, CA
Inglewood, CA
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine M. Hernandez
3411 SILVERSIDE ROAD200 HANBY BUILDINGWILMINGTON, DE 19810Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, compacts, concealers, blushes, mascaras, make-up foundations, eye pencils, eyebrow pencils, lipsticks, lip foundation, lip gloss, lip pencils, non-medicated lip balm, eye shadow, eye-liners, artificial eyelashes, eyebrow gloss, nail polish, nail polish top coat, nail polish base coat, artificial fingernails, and rouges; bath items, namely, crystals, foam, gels, oil, pearls, and powder; hair products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, gel, lighteners, hair mousse, lotions, mascara, and pomades; skin care products, namely, astringent for cosmetic purposes, bath gel, bath oil, beauty masks, bubble bath, eye make-up remover, facial scrubs, make-up remover, shower gel, skin mousse, massage oil, shaving cream, skin clarifiers, skin soap, skin emollients and anti-wrinkle cream; skin care preparations, namely, moisturizers, body lotions and creams; oils, namely, perfume oil and suntan oil; fragrances, namely, perfume, and cologne; lotions, namely, suntan, skin, hair, and facial lotions; and incense | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by R&R APPAREL COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ROCK & REPUBLIC ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ball, Michael F.
- Other trademarks owned by R&R APPAREL COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named REPUBLIC BY R&R
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |