USPTO serial 85072198
DEAL BREAKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEAL BREAKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Oshinsky
DAVID B. OSHINSKY CADENCE LAW, P.C.9415 Culver BlvdCulver City, CA 90232UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing television game show; production and distribution of motion pictures and television shows, all in the fields of game shows, variety, comedy, and drama shows; providing online, non-downloadable continuing television programs, motion pictures and entertainment shows, all in the fields of game shows and variety, comedy, and drama shows, via the Internet and via a video-on-demand service | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eric Winter & Colton Gramm Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Eric Winter & Colton Gramm Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by DEAL BREAKER, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DEAL BREAKER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |