USPTO serial 85072409
CLOUDPAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOUDPAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aigle, CH
Aigle, CH
MONT-SUR-LAUSANNE, CH
MONT-SUR-LAUSANNE, CH
MONT-SUR-LAUSANNE, CH
MONT-SUR-LAUSANNE, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. Coleman
Brian R. Coleman PERKINS COIE LLP3150 PORTER DRIVEPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices, namely, personal computing devices and televisions for use in accessing virtual desktop and application rental services none of the foregoing related to portable handheld electronic devices; computer networking devices, namely, components for establishing a connection to a virtual desktop and application rental service; computer hardware device in the nature of personal computers, televisions, and computing hardware for creating and managing virtual desktop functionality for clients none of the foregoing related to portable handheld electronic devices; Computing devices that provide software for transmitting data, graphics, audio or video over electronic communications networks none of the foregoing related to portable handheld electronic devices; computer hardware device for use in accessing computer software applications of others none of the foregoing related to portable handheld electronic devices; Computing device for use in rental of computer software used in the field of global computer information networks none of the foregoing related to portable handheld electronic devices; Computing device for hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, files, and databases for others via a virtual desktop available via a computer network none of the foregoing related to portable handheld electronic devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMX iNet Global Services SA
- Other trademarks owned by SMX iNet Global Services SA
- Other trademarks owned by NHOLDINGS SA
- Other trademarks owned by NHOLDINGS SA
- Other trademarks owned by NHOLDINGS SA
- Other trademarks owned by NHOLDINGS SA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CLOUDPAD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |