USPTO serial 85073498
BUSINESS CONSCIOUSNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUSINESS CONSCIOUSNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin M. Welch
JUSTIN M. WELCH BLAZIER, CHRISTENSEN, BIGELWO & VIRRSTE 2000221 W 6TH STAUSTIN, TX 78701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books in the field of business | ACTIVE | Jul 23, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2014 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2014 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2011 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |