USPTO serial 85074897
CUCINA URBANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUCINA URBANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Reggie Borkum
REGGIE BORKUM BLANCHARD KRASNER & FRENCH800 SILVERADO ST FL 2LA JOLLA, CA 92037-4274UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese spreads; Dairy-based spreads; Fruit-based spreads; Meat-based spreads; Vegetable-based spreads; Prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Ready-made sauces; Sauces | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services; Restaurant | ACTIVE | Jun 24, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |