USPTO serial 85075565
EXTRUSION TOOLING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXTRUSION TOOLING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Markham, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl Wm. Means
KARL WM. MEANS SHULMAN, ROGERS, GANDAL, PORDY & ECKER, P.A.12505 PARK POTOMAC AVE FL 6POTOMAC, MD 20854-6803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Extrusion dies and die rings for machines; tooling for extrusion dies and extrusion machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacturing and design of extrusion dies, die rings and tooling for the extrusion industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering and testing of extrusion dies, die rings and tooling for the extrusion industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Exco Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Exco Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EXTRUSION TOOLING SOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |