USPTO serial 85076598
THE CONVERSATION COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE CONVERSATION COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allison L. Rapp
ALLISON L. RAPP LUTZKER & LUTZKER LLP1233 20TH ST NWSTE 703WASHINGTON, DC 20036-7304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technical consultation services, namely, help desk support services and diagnostic services in the fields of computer hardware, computer software, local area networking, and connectivity to a global computer network; computer services, namely, remote online backup of computer data; computer services, namely, data storage and recovery services; computer services, namely, maintaining a repository of digital data for others; computer network design for others; installation, maintenance, and repair of computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of wired and wireless computer networks of others; computer services, namely, setup and troubleshooting of printers, scanners, and other computer peripherals; computer services, namely, diagnostic consultation services in the field of computer security; computer technical support services, namely, computer diagnostic services, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems, and providing remote maintenance of computer software; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for the backup, storage, and recovery of computer data; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for protecting computers against hackers, viruses, spyware, spam, and other internet threats to computer security; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer services, namely, search engine optimization services; computer services, namely, design, development, hosting, and maintenance of web pages, web sites, online promotional videos, and online display advertisements of others; computer services, namely, monitoring, analyzing, and reporting on traffic to the web pages, web sites, online promotional videos, and online display advertisements of others; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for designing, developing, maintaining, monitoring, and analyzing traffic to web pages, web sites, online promotional videos, and online display advertisements; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for monitoring and reporting on the performance of online marketing, advertising, and promotional campaigns, and for developing strategies for improving same; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for operating online retail and electronic commerce websites; rental of computer equipment, namely, gateway routers; computer co-location services, namely, providing secure facilities for the location of computer servers and networking equipment belonging to others; burstable bandwidth services, namely, rental of bandwidth for web hosting services; computer support services, namely, monitoring of network systems and servers of others; computer support services, namely, providing troubleshooting services in the nature of diagnosing network and server problems for others; computer support services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |