USPTO serial 85076600
FRONTIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2014
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FRONTIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Frontier Communications Corporation
Stamford, CT
Other trademarks owned by Frontier Communications Corporation
Frontier Communications Corporation
Norwalk, CT
Other trademarks owned by Frontier Communications Corporation
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, LLC
NORWALK, CT
Other trademarks owned by FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, LLC
Frontier Communications Corporation
Stamford, CT
Other trademarks owned by Frontier Communications Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana N. Justus
Dana N. Justus Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.1101 K Street, N.W.10th FloorWashington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technical consultation services, namely, help desk support services and diagnostic services in the fields of computer hardware, computer software, local area networking, and connectivity to a global computer network; computer services, namely, remote online backup of computer data; [ computer services, namely, data recovery services; computer services, namely, maintaining a repository of digital data for others; computer network design for others; ] technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; technical support, namely, remote and on-site management of wired and wireless computer networks of others; [ remote computer network technical monitoring and software maintenance services; ] technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with printers, scanners, and other computer peripherals; [ diagnostic consultation services in the field of computer security; ] computer technical support services, namely, computer diagnostic services, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems, [ and providing remote maintenance of computer software; ] providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for the backup, storage, and recovery of computer data; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for protecting computers against hackers, viruses, spyware, spam, and other internet threats to computer security [ ; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer services, namely, search engine optimization services; computer services, namely, design, development, hosting, and maintenance of web pages, web sites, online promotional videos, and online display advertisements of others; computer services, namely, monitoring, analyzing, and reporting on traffic to the web pages, web sites, online promotional videos, and online display advertisements of others; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for designing, developing, maintaining, monitoring, and analyzing traffic to web pages, web sites, online promotional videos, and online display advertisements; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for monitoring and reporting on the performance of online marketing, advertising, and promotional campaigns, and for developing strategies for improving same; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for operating online retail and electronic commerce websites; rental of computer equipment, namely, gateway routers; computer co-location services, namely, providing secure facilities for the location of computer servers and networking equipment belonging to others; burstable bandwidth services, namely, rental of bandwidth for web hosting services; computer support services, namely, monitoring of network systems and servers of others; computer support services, namely, providing troubleshooting services in the nature of diagnosing network and server problems for others; computer support services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others ] | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frontier Communications Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Frontier Communications Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Frontier Communications Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FRONTIER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 13, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 13, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |