USPTO serial 85076805
HSIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HSIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
JORDAN A LAVINE FLASTER GREENBERG PC1600 JFK BOULEVARD2ND FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cellular phones; smart phones; mobile computers; mobile television receivers; mobile TV sets; netbooks; computers; PC tablet; telematics apparatus, namely, wireless internet devices which provide telematic services and have a cellular phone function; portable telephones; portable televisions; wireless adapter modules for computers; wireless connectivity computer hardware modules; GPS modules; audio amplifier modules; video modules composed of computer monitors; electric sensors; portable navigation devices, namely, computers; GPS navigation devices; voltage regulators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | PGDV | PETITION GRANTED - REQUEST TO DIVIDE FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |