Drawing for EAGLE CREEK

USPTO serial 85077428

EAGLE CREEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DESAI, BRIN ANDERSON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EAGLE CREEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Turk

Christopher M. Turk VF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, INC.3411 SILVERSIDE RD200 Hanby BuildingWILMINGTON, DE 19810-4812

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for men, women and children, namely, pants, shorts, vests, shirts, blouses, skirts, dresses, sweatshirts, fleece pullovers, coats, jackets, parkas, rainwear, under garments, nightwear, socks; headwear, hats, caps; gloves; scarves; belts; footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 27, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 21, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 2, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2010CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Oct 18, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2010CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 7, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance