Drawing for WW WONDERFUL WICKS

USPTO serial 85078444

WW WONDERFUL WICKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WW WONDERFUL WICKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Broder

James P. Broder ROEDER & BRODER LLP4817 Biona Dr.SAN DIEGO, CA 92116United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Candles; Scented candlesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 4, 2012MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2012ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance